Navigation auf uzh.ch
Anders, Y., Daniel, H.-D., Hannover, B., Köller, O., Lenzen, D., McElvany, N., Rossbach, H.-G., Seidel, T., Tippelt, R., & Wössman, L. (2021). Nachhaltigkeit im Bildungswesen - was jetzt getan werden muss (vbw - Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft e.V, Ed.). Waxmann Verlag.
Anders, Y., Daniel, H.-D., Hannover, B., Köller, O., Lenzen, D., McElvany, N., Seidel, T., Tippelt, R., Wilbers, K., & Wössman, L. (2021). Führung, Leitung, Governance: Verantwortung im Bildungssystem (vbw – Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft e.V., Ed.). Waxmann Verlag GmbH. https://doi.org/10.31244/9783830994008
Böckelmann, C., Probst, C., Wassmer, C., & Baumann, S. (2021). Lecturers’ qualifications and activities as indicators of convergence and differentiation in the Swiss higher education system. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1923547
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Haunschild, R., Moya-Anegon, F. de, Almeida Madeira Clemende, M. de, & Stefander, M. (2021). Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups in excellencemapping.net: a new release of the excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores. Scientometrics 126 (11), 9305–9331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04141-4
Braun, E., Esterhazy, R., & Kordts-Freudinger, R. (Eds.). (2021). Research on teaching and learning in higher education. Waxmann Verlag.
Bromme, R., & Gierth, L. (2021). Rationality and the Public Understanding of Science. In M. Knauff & W. Spohn (Eds.), The Handbook of Rationality. MIT Press.
Bucchi, M. (2021a). Norms, Competition, and Visibility in Contemporary Science. In A. Delicado, F. Crettaz Von Roten, & K. Prpić (Eds.), Communicating science and technology in society: issues of public accountability and engagement (pp. 17–37). Springer.
Bucchi, M. (2021b). To boost vaccination rates, invest in trust. Nature Italy. www.nature.com/articles/d43978-021-00003-y
Bucchi, M., Askwall, C., Fähnrich, B., Trench, B., & Weißkopf, M. (2021). Trust in science: assessing pandemic impacts in four EU countries. https://www.academia.edu/44960835/Trust_in_science_assessing_pandemic_impacts_in_four_EU_countries
Bucchi, M., & Saracino, B. (2021). Scienza e società all’epoca della pandemia. Scienza,tecnologia e opinione pubblica in Italia nel 2020. In G. Pellegrini & B. Saracino (Eds.), Annuario Scienza Tecnologia e Società (pp. 11–48). il Mulino.
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2021). Rethinking science communication as the social conversation around science. Journal of Science Communication, 20(3), Y01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030401
Bundi, P., Frey, K., & Widmer, T. (2021). Does evaluation quality enhance evaluation use? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16141794148067
Busemeyer, M. R., & Garritzmann, J. L. (2021). Public Opinion on Education Policies: A Multi-country Perspective. In M. R. West & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Public opinion and the political economy of education policy around the world. The MIT Press.
Daniel, H.-D. (2021). Hochschule. In vbw – Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft e.V. (Ed.), Führung, Leitung, Governance: Verantwortung im Bildungssystem (pp. 175–187). Waxmann Verlag GmbH. https://doi.org/10.31244/9783830994008
Farys, R., & Wolbring, T. (2021). Matthew effects in science and the serial diffusion of ideas: Testing old ideas with new methods. Quantitative Science Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00129
Garritzmann, S., & Garritzmann, J. L. (2021). Die Bildungspolitik der Grün-Schwarzen Regierung in Baden-Württemberg 2016-2021. In F. Hörisch & Wurster Stefan (Eds.), Kiwi im Südwesten – Eine Bilanz der zweiten Landesregierung Kretschmann 2016-2021. Springer VS.
Hauck-Thum, U., & Noller, J. (Eds.). (2021). Analog oder digital? Philosophieren nach dem Ende der Philosophie. In Was ist Digitalität?: Philosophische und pädagogische Perspektiven (Vol. 1). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62989-5
Hendriks, B., Cornelia, S., Heger, C., & Reinhart, M. (2021). Kritische Bestandsaufnahme des BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Programms: Untersuchungen einer integrierten Forschungsund Facharztweiterbildung in der Universitätsmedizin. Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung GmbH (DZHW). https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/ab_26/KritischeBestandsaufnahme.pdf
Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2021). Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct. Social Studies of Science, 51(3), 414–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720975201
Jerke, J., Johann, D., Rauhut, H., Thomas, K., & Velicu, A. (2021). Handle with Care: Implementation of the List Experiment and Crosswise Model in a Large-scale Survey on Academic Misconduct. Field Methods, 1525822X20985629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X20985629
Johann, D., & Mayer, S. J. (2021). Do Interviewers Affect Measures of Factual Political Knowledge? Evidence from Austria and Germany. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, edab002. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edab002
Kordts-Freudinger, R., Schaper, N., Scholkmann, A., Szczyrba, B., & Uni-Taschenbücher GmbH. (2021). Handbuch Hochschuldidaktik. (1st ed.). wbv.
Maag Merki, K. (2021). Empirische Bildungsforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Rückblick und Ausblick. Swiss Journal of Educational Research, 43(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.24452/sjer.43.1.4
Mede, N. G., Schäfer, M. S., Ziegler, R., & Weißkopf, M. (2021). The “replication crisis” in the public eye: Germans’ awareness and perceptions of the (ir)reproducibility of scientific research. Public Understanding of Science, 30(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520954370
Metag, J. (2021). Tension between visibility and invisibility: Science communication in new information environments. Studies in Communication Sciences, 1–16–1–16. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2021.01.009
Neugebauer, M., Daniel, H.-D., & Wolter, A. (Eds.). (2021). Studienerfolg und Studienabbruch. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32892-4
Ochsner, M. (2021a). 2.5 Bibliometrics in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. In R. Ball (Ed.), Handbook bibliometrics (pp. 117–124). De Gruyter Saur.
Ochsner, M. (2021b). Relationship between Peer Review and Bibliometrics. In R. Ball (Ed.), Handbook Bibliometrics (pp. 125–132). De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646610-014
Ochsner, M., Kulczycki, E., Gedutis, A., & Peruginelli, G. (2021). National Research Evaluation Systems. In Handbook Bibliometrics (pp. 99–106). De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646610-011
Pfister, C., Koomen, M., Harhoff, D., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2021). Regional innovation effects of applied research institutions. Research Policy, 50(4), 104197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104197
Reinhart, M. (2021). Open Science as an Engine of Anxiety: How Scientists Promote and Defend the Visibility of Their Digital Selves, while Becoming Fatalistic about Academic Careers [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2vr7j
Reinhart, M., & Schendzielorz, C. (2021). Trends in Peer Review [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nzsp5
Rost, K., Doehne, M., & Osterloh, M. (2021). Richter*in per Los. Justice - Justiz - Giustizia, 1. https://richterzeitung.weblaw.ch/rzissues/2021/1/richter-in-per-los_3d0810b646.html__ONCE
Rost, K., Döhne, M., Osterloh, M., & Berger, J. (2021). Führungskräfteauswahl per Los. Personalmagazin, 40–43.
Schäfer, M. S., & Metag, J. (2021). Audiences of science communication between pluralisation, fragmentation and polarisation. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (Third edition). Routledge.
Schäfer, M. S., & Painter, J. (2021). Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world. WIREs Climate Change, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.675
Schlegel, T., Pfister, C., Harhoff, D., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2021). Innovation effects of universities of applied sciences: an assessment of regional heterogeneity. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09839-w
Schoen, C., & Rost, K. (2021). What really works?! Evaluating the effectiveness of practices to increase the managerial diversity of women and minorities. European Management Journal, 39(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.06.005
Schömer, D., Laumer, S., Treischl, E., Weigert, J., Wilbers, K., & Wolbring, T. (2021). Data-driven Student Advisory and Potential Direct Discrimination: A Literature Review on Machine Learning for Predicting Students’ Academic Success. Americas Conference on Information Systems.
Schultheiss, T., Pfister, C., Gnehm, A.-S., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2021). Tertiary education expansion and task demand: Does a rising tide lift all boats? (Working Paper No. 154; Economics of Education Working Paper Series). Swiss Leading House “Economics of Education.” https://ideas.repec.org/p/iso/educat/0154.html
Thies, K., & Kordts-Freudinger, R. (2021). Wie gehen Hochschullehrende mit ihren Emotionen in der Lehre um? Eine Experience-sampling-Befragung zum situativen Emotionsausdruck von Freude, Angst und Ärger. ZeHf – Zeitschrift für empirische Hochschulforschung, 4(2). https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/zehf/article/view/37032
Tkotz, J., Kienhues, D., Jucks, R., & Bromme, R. (2021). Keep Calm in Heated Debates: How People Perceive Different Styles of Discourse in a Scientific Debate. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.572503
Treischel, E., Laumer, S., Schrömer, D., Weigert, J., Wilbers, T., & Wolbring, T. (2021). Give a Little, Take a Little? A Factorial Survey Experiment on Students’ Willingness to Use an AI-based Advisory System and to Share Data. In T. Wolbring, H. Leitgöb, & F. Faulbaum (Eds.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter (pp. 251–278). Spinger VS. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658343958
Widmer, T. (2021). Evaluation in der Schweiz. In R. Stockmann & W. Meyer (Eds.), Die Institutionalisierung der Evaluation in Europa. (pp. 163–184). Waxmann Verlag.
Wilhelm, E. (2021). Die Pädagogische Hochschule der Zukunft. Eine Vision und ein paar konkrete Anregungen für die künftige Hochschulgestaltung. Das Magazin Der Pädagogischen Hochschule, 3.
Zimmerli, W. Ch. (2021). Künstliche Intelligenz und postanaloges Menschsein. Entstehung, Entwicklung und Wirkung eines realen Mythos. In A. Strasser, W. Sohst, K. Stepec, & R. Stapelfeldt (Eds.), Künstliche Intelligenz - Die große Verheißung (Vol. 8, pp. 193–219). Xenomoi-Verlag.
Zimmerli, W. Ch. (2021, November 1). Die künstliche Intelligenz übertrifft irgendwann die menschliche und übernimmt die Macht: warum dies ein Mythos ist und wie er sich auswirkt. Neue Zürcher Zeitung.